This is my last and final post in the Small Group series! We have come to assessing, probably one of the more confusing and frustrating aspects of small group planning! I will admit here and now that I still have not mastered this aspect of small groups, although I felt I did a slightly better job with it in math than I did for reading. Assessing reading in small groups can be daunting, as there are so many skills under the umbrella of reading, a teacher can have a hard time knowing where to start.

p.s. If you want the "stuff" it's at the end of the post 😉​

When should I assess?
Think back to the very first post in the series, and notice that it started with an assessment component as well. Imagine you have worked with your kids in small groups on the skills you assessed, and four to six weeks have passed and you feel that A) It's time to move on or B) You think a majority of the students in their groups are grasping this skill, but you need to make sure.

That is exactly what you will assess again. This is the part that can seem confusing, because Small Group is a response intervention. It can be connected to what students are learning whole group, but more often than not we are filling gaps in small group, so it seems disconnected and piece-meal, and therefore it seems wrong somehow to assess something so wildly different from what the entire class is working on. 

Who should be assessed?
Ideally you should assess all groups on the main skill they have been working on so you can close the circle on this skill and start on another skill. You will also have to opportunity to shuffle your groups around for this new skill. Any student who hasn't mastered what you've been teaching needs to stay in the group (or be reordered into a different group with other students who also didn't master it) and new groups need to be formed for students who did master their skills and are ready for something new.

This would be considered your summative assessment, and it would be wise to hang on to this data in order to inform any meetings you have about students and their progress. You will now be able to clearly state that you worked with these students three times a week on R.L.2.1 using who, what, when, where, why, and how questions, and after four weeks little Bono was able to read a passage and create five out of five questions and answer them correctly. Very powerful data to have!

How should I assess?
The scenario I described is excellent when gathering data for many students at once. This is summative data that sums up what each group knows after the intervention. 

However, many times in small group students will be reading or doing math and you realize that all five student just made the same math error or got stuck on the same word. You mark it down on your small group notes. You have taken a formative assessment, or an assessment in the moment. This is an added wrinkle to the whole assessment game, because you may be able to correct that right there in the moment and all your students understand and will improve from there. No other assessments needed. 

Or, they may give you a deer in the headlights look and then you realize you stumbled upon a gap that all the students share. You can either decide to roll it into what they've been learning, or decide to finish the skill for this session and start on this gap on the next session.

What should I use to assess?
This depends on what you used to initially screen your students and if you have any ideas for what to work on next. If you were working on multiplication tables or phonics and you used a CORE screener for the phonics and a simple times table for the math, it's a safe bet you can re-use this screener as a post-assessment to see how they improved.

If you are doing something a little more in depth, say one step word problems with addition and no regrouping, I don't see anything wrong with using the same screener, but maybe this time you may want to add on another step in the word problem (still using addition and no regrouping) and see how they do. Maybe for the reading if you were working on R.L.2.1, give them a second passage that is a little more rigorous and see what happens. This will help you assess how deep their knowledge went, and if they can make other connections to something similar. You can also combine a post-assess with a pre-assess to inform instruction for the next session.

In general, try to use the same assessment that you used when you first screened them so you can have a true measure of how they progressed, or use something very similar. This will help put less work on you as well, because now you can just keep a stack of fresh assessments ready to go.

I assessed and now I have a group with one student, and a big group with eight, help!
This is normal and happens a lot! You may need to assess the big group again with something a little more in depth to see what differences between the groups you can find. Ideally you want each group to be like one student, no one should be higher or lower on the scale, but we all know that in the real world things don't always work out that way. 

As to the group with one, I suggest leaving it that way. You will be amazed at how much you can get done with just one student, and how quickly, and before it's time to assess again they may be ready to move to another group! 

My formative group notes are all over the place, this system isn't working!
I absolutely hear you, and this was my personal roadblock for a long time.

First I kept a binder of each group with little post its. I used it for two weeks and then stopped. Then I tried just using a plain Google Doc for each group, but it got messy really quickly. I tried many systems, and paper or digital I didn't seem to matter, making notes was impossible! How was I supposed to keep notes on every student everyday that I worked with them? I just didn't have enough minutes in between each group to stop and take the kind of notes I wanted.

However, I'm not everyone. Many of my colleagues keep successful notes in binders, many made Google Doc work. So, I'll tell you what I do, and then I'll describe what some of my colleagues do and let you try some out! It's all about finding a system that works FOR YOU!

Digital:

​Alison, from Learning at the Primary Pond, did an in-depth post about the GRO Small Group App. I have not personally tried it because my districts iPad wouldn't let me download it (😭) but I really want to try it! Be sure to check out her post here and the app website here. I believe you can use for reading or math, but I am not sure.

Then there's my way, I shared a picture of this in Part 2 I believe. Now, this is ​not my original idea and I've scoured the internet trying to find the original post I came across five years ago, but of course I can't. Just know the idea isn't mine! 

Anywho! The idea is to create a Google Doc with a table of all your kids. Then create a separate document for each student with a table in the document for the date and notes. Take the link from each student's own Google Doc and hyperlink it to their name on the original table of all the students. That way you can have the original Doc up, click on the name to open their page, and take your notes. This is what I currently do now, and I update it once a week, usually on Fridays. That way I have a record of every skill every student has ever worked on and their progress for the whole year. 

You can also see that I link other things for their lessons, standards, skills etc. This is easily adapted for reading or math! This is my Holy Grail right now! If you want a tutorial on how to set this up you can comment below or on my IG for this post!

​Paper:
​
If you're a paper and pencil kinda person, then I have two methods for you to try. The first is from one of my all-time favorite teacher bloggers, Michael from The Thinker Builder. I have used many of his resources, and they have never let me down! This post on tracking readers could easily be adapted for math as well. He has many versions of this resource he created, for tracking individual students, and tracking groups. Be sure to check out his post here.

The last resource I have is a freebie from Jennifer Findley, and is probably one of the simplest methods I have seen. If you're not sure where to start, you have nothing to lose starting here because she is giving this resource away, and it is an amazingly simple system! This worked for me for a long time before I decided to jump to digital, and I still use her simple layout of Date and Notes. Be sure to check out her post here, and grab your freebie!

The last resource I have is an idea I got from LaTawnya of SmartieStyle. I remember awhile back she posted on her Instagram that she was getting a special planner from Erin Condren just for small group planning and anecdotal notes. I mean, who wouldn't love a gorgeous planner just for small group? You can find the different planners here. 

Thanks for all your support for my Small Group Series and I hope you found it helpful! 😁​

​xoxo-Mae

During student teaching the only system I saw for organizing kids in the room during small groups was rotation station style. I grew increasingly frustrated with this model during my first two years of teaching, and sought out alternatives. I found the Must Do/May Do model on Pinterest, tried it, and loved it. Oddly enough I still liked the rotation station method for math centers, as I was able to quickly see all my students and keep the room and energy moving. In today's post I am going to share with you the pros and cons of each method!

Rotation Station Style: Students are assigned stations around the classroom and must stay with their group and station for a set time period. When the teacher signals (or slides change, or timer goes off) students rotate with their group to the next station. This repeats until all students have gone to every station.

Pros:

• Visually the teacher can easily see which tasks students are completing.
• All students will meet with the teacher.
• Students can use a visual, like slides or pocket charts, to see which assignment and station they are supposed to be in.
• Can quickly get a set of tasks done if each rotation is about 10-15 minutes long.
• Assignments for stations can be flexible and extended out beyond a single day
• Stations can be added in as needed

Cons:

• Students can get each other off-task since they must stay within their station and group.
• Takes a long time to set up stations/assignments/teach procedures.
• Teacher has to be prepared to teach a lesson to all students/majority of students daily.
• Less flexibility for who the teacher sees and how much time is spent with those students (i.e. Teacher cannot pull three students from different groups to work on a skill for 30 minutes.)

Must Do/May Do: Students have groups and two lists of assignments:  a must do list, and once those are complete there is another list of activities they may complete. Students do not need to stay with their group, and there are no stations. The teacher is free to pull whomever they choose.

Pros:

• Teacher can plan for and pull any students they need to. They can also create different groups for different tasks. (ex. In the beginning of the year they may pull one student at a time for screeners. The teacher may create alternative groups for Book Club, Writing, or Word Problems to meet students needs.)
• Teachers have more flexibility in the Must Do assignments, and can create more accountability by tying them to current class work.
• Teachers have even more flexibility in the May Do tasks, and assign challenge material that may not often come up in class work (social studies, science, news articles, experiments, PBL projects, reader's theatre, etc)
• Students are free to work alone or with others (at teacher discretion), and are not anchored to one spot in the room (perfect for those with flexible seating.)

Cons:

• ​Takes a lot of time up front to set up and figure out the visual supports for the assignment lists, groups, and computer schedules. (i.e. using slides, pocket charts, or combinations etc)
• Harder to visually "see" where students are in their assignments.
• Extra flexibility can mean more work on the teacher. Since the same groups are not being pulled in a predictable manner, it can be tough to make decisions about who to pull and why, and then more work to plan the lessons.
• Takes a lot of time to teach the procedures to students at first.

I hope that this post has given you some good information about the two methods. Be sure to check out the Recommended Readings to see the original sources for these two ideas, and download the Must Do/May Do freebie offered by 1st Grade Pandamania!

The basic answer I have for this is that there is no "wrong" thing students should be doing while you are teaching, as long as they are engaged in assignments with purpose. Children know when they are being given seat work that will never be looked at or graded or count toward anything, and they will quickly grow bored and resentful about this. 

So, what constitutes "assignments with purpose?" This will depend entirely on your class. Think carefully about the skills you want your students to know and learn by the end of the year, or the trimester, or the quarter. This will also depend on the age and independence of your students. I am firm believer than students can do approximately 100% than we think they can do, and its mostly adults not being patient enough or clear enough with our expectations. So, let's start there!

Small Group Expectations: Modeling & Positive Praise Are Key

Never assume students know what to do during guided reading or math. Also, never assume that even with clear directions it will turn out the way you want the first time. Model, model, model. Even with 5th graders I will introduce one task at a time and spend 10 minutes modeling moving around the room narrating what I am doing. Then I let them try, and if it's not what I want I will stop and give positive praise about what they did do correct, and adjust by modeling what to improve and we try again. I do this daily for about a month, slowly introducing new assignments, starting with the simplest ones and ending with the hardest ones (technology and book club.) 

While you are doing this I highly suggest you do not teach during this time, just watch and monitor. At some point you'll be left with one or two students who need adjustment and that's when you can coach them on procedures one-on-one, or assign them a buddy to help.

What are some meaningful assignments I can give?

For small group reading I generally stick to Word Study, Writing, Technology, Book Club, Silent Reading, Independent Reading Comprehension, and I do a Must Do/May Do system where students have two weeks to finish their assignments. This system worked for 2nd, 3rd, and the 5th graders I teach now. 

For small group math I did a rotation system, where students moved through Teacher Time, Technology, Problem Set, and Skill Drill. Groups were decided based on their exit tickets the day before. Rotations were about 15-20 minutes each. Skill Drill was the station I changed every month to two months based on what we were working on at the time. 

Word Study: At the beginning of the year I use spiral journals and glue a nine choice menu of word study assignments onto the front cover. During the first two weeks of school I teach one activity to the whole class each day. Assignments include 5 Clues, Spelling Grid, Add It Up, Vocabulary Sort, Flash Cards, Short Story, Picture It, ABC Order, and Greek/Latin Roots. In a two week period students need to finish two activities that I star in their journals and check off its completion. Words come from the glossary of their weekly book (see Independent Reading Comprehension), and they can add any interesting words to my living word wall any time.

Writing: This station usually turns into "finish whatever we worked on today during Writing," thus allowing students to keep themselves accountable and develop an intrinsic motivation to take advantage of the time given to work on something they care about. Another idea would be to use Michael Friermood's Keep It Fresh Writing Centers.

Technology: When I had only six computers for my class I had a whole rotation system for students to work their way through each week, but now that I have more computers I can use more tools and get more students on at one time to target the skills the need. Here is a list of my favorite technology sites for reading and math:

• Brainpop
• NoRedInk
• Readtheory
• Typing.com
• STMath
• Google Classroom 

There are a ton more tools out there that I haven't gotten a chance to use and vet, but these have been my go-to for five years and have shown great results in my classroom.

Book Club: Once every week or so I meet with students to discuss a book we a re reading together. I assign their work in Google Classroom over a shared Google Slide. They love it, and we have a great time discussing literary elements in depth and had made a bigger difference in their comprehension than any lesson I could create.

Silent Reading: Students have a full 30 minutes everyday during guided reading to enjoy a book of their choice. They can read independently or with a partner. I don't use logs or reading reports, I don't restrict what books they can read or level my library. They can read books, menus, maps, comics, ebooks, do Readtheory. 

Independent Reading Comprehension: This is probably the only worksheet type assignment I give, but I give it because I can use it to track real growth over any given period of time. I print leveled books from Reading A-Z and I also print all the supplemental skill drills, quizzes, and vocabulary work (from Vocabulary A-Z) to go with it and create a packet. This packet is due completed in a two week period, where I check off on its completion and take notes on skills that they struggled on to inform my lessons during small group time. They then take the book home to add to their library at home. 

Skill Drill: For math I purchase many things from TPT, but once I found Math Tech Connections I stopped using anyone else's resources. Her stuff is so good, simple, and reusable, it was a no-brainer. I even got a grant to laminate her 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade sorts into reusable puzzles with velcro. The main thing I love about her stuff is I could pick standards for any grade level and do skill drill with all my groups no matter what their level. I also recommend her Tri-Folds, Math Games, and any of her digital products (Google Classroom compatible!).

Next Week:

Part 3: Must Do/May Do versus Rotation

For the next four weeks our topic is going to be small group planning, for reading and math. If you were part of my Instagram Stories poll I asked my followers a series of questions about what stresses them out as teachers. Small group planning came out on top as something that stresses you out!

The purpose for small groups, in either math or reading, is to guide students with a specific goal in mind in order to teach them to be independent learners. Usually this occurs for a set block of time, where the teacher pulls groups, and the remaining students not meeting with the teacher work on other skills independently.

Small group planning has a unique set of problems and moving parts that need to be solved in order for the teacher to effectively manage his or her small group they are currently meeting with.

This post is Part 1 of a four part series on Small Groups. In today's post we will focus on the most important aspect of small group learning-what the teacher is teaching! 

**I just got to writing number four and wanted to jump back up to the top to tell my readers that I know that the most difficult part of small groups is planning for six groups. I know all these steps, written out, seem incredibly daunting, and the fact that we have to do it daily seems impossible. However! If you hang in there and keep reading my take on small group planning encourages consolidating through standards, to streamline what each group is doing by taking advantage of the way our standards build on one another, so that you WON'T be planning six different skills for six different groups. I really hope this is helpful for you!**

My first year of teaching I totally sucked at small group reading time. I had only seen it done well one time during my student teaching, and it was with first graders. I never saw how she planned or when she gathered her materials, so when it was time to do it myself I was completely lost and had no clue how to start. Eventually I landed on the Must Do/May Do system (which I will talk about in another post), extended my planning out to more than one week, and met with less groups for longer so we could dig deeper. 

1. Targeted Instruction: What are you teaching and to whom?

Use an assessment to test your class on a particular standard, skill, or focus to determine what they all need to improve on. In reading for littles this should include phonics, sight words, and fluency. For mid to upper grades we should still include phonics, sight words, and fluency because we all know upper grade students come to use with gaps, but now we want to include comprehension and writing skills as well. In math take a look at the core standards for your grade level and find an assessment that will take a dipstick for each core area, but for all ages students need to be assessed on their place value knowledge above all.

Once you have assessed your class you are ready to group students by the skills they need to work on. One thing I like to do to reduce the amount of planning that is needed is to find a common standard that all kids need, and plan instruction around this standard at different levels. For example, in general my class may need more work on theme, so I choose to teach R.L.2, but the second grade, fourth grade, and seventh grade versions of this strand because that's where my groups are. In this way I target planning for myself and my students so that the learning doesn't seem so fragmented and difficult to organize.

Reading Assessment Examples: NWEA, PARCC, iReady, DIBELS, CORE Phonics Screener, Oral Reading Analysis, Running Record, exit tickets, writing samples, and any assessments included with your school's curriculum.

Math Assessment Examples: Pre-assessments (this could be as simple as giving the end unit test first before you start the unit), exit tickets, blank multiplication charts, math screeners, and any assessments included in your school's curriculum.

2. Plan and gather materials: Be intentional!

Now that you know what your goal is for your students and you have them specifically grouped, you can plan intentionally how you will teach this skill. This is usually where the roadblocks come in. I know many teachers who can assess and group, but get their minds in a mess over HOW to go about teaching it. My personal opinion on this is because targeted small group teaching can feel so fragmented; where is the bigger picture? Are we as a group actually making progress? How will it all fit together in the end? It's also difficult because there are so many skills to work on! How do you pick?

• To think of bigger picture, go back to your standards, specifically priority ones (hint, check the item specifications for your states test to see which standards come up most frequently.) Then think of which skills most of your groups need right now in order to build upon other skills. Now you have a plan for small groups that is targeted in the micro and macro sense. If any students master skills then move them to a different group.
• Think about what materials you need to teach this skill. Keep. It. Simple! Use journals instead of loose pieces of paper. Use graphic organizers that students can draw then and there instead of printing off pre-made ones. Use white boards or Expo markers on bare desks. Have students make flash cards instead of making your own. Keep these materials near to your table and grouped, or have students be responsible for bringing them when you meet. (If you are lacking in books or articles I highly recommend Reading A-Z, it's worth the price, trust me! If you need free, check out ReadWorks or Newsela.) 
• Think about the best way to keep your plans. Will a digital table on Google Docs work? Do you need formal written plans in your planner? A simple spiral notebook? I've tried many ways to keep my plans, both paper, journal, and digital, and the best way for me to keep track of my long term and short term small group plans is to put them on a single table on Google Docs so I can always refer to them wherever I am. If I want to take a trip down to our book room I don't need to run to my room to look at my paper planner, I can pull them up on my phone. 
• For math, I used exit tickets and sorted my students every day based on how they did the day before. I had three to four groups: remediation where we reviewed the skill and its connection to the current skill, high achievement group where we extended and dug deeper, and one or two mid-level groups that needed to solidify their skills and tighten up strategies. The bigger picture would enter in when we would move past the current unit and address gaps.

3. Determine your time frame.

Here is the key to success: SLOW DOWN. Early in my career I would plan for one book per group per week. I had 15-20 minutes to meet with my groups each day. We never got through all the skills I wanted to cover and every week I felt like a failure. I was exhausted as well because although my plans were solid, I was always planning! So, this is another roadblock. Why spend hours planning when you can't get to everything? Solution, slow down. Spend two weeks per book. Really dive deep and get to analyzing and critiquing. Get to writing! See mastery happen! Instead of spending 15 minutes per group, spend 30. 

I know, I know, it seems crazy. But really, it gives you time to think ahead. I usually keep Google Notes up and jot down ideas for the next two week block (remember to cover compound words; this group needs practice with adding fractions; this group really loves animals find some books.) Look over your notes while you plan for the next block and insert these ideas into your plans. You will still be working within your big picture framework we talked about earlier, but including all those skills that drive us crazy that your kids need right now because you observed it.

Also, don't be afraid to chuck your plans. If halfway through week one you realize your mid-level group would understand a concept better with something else, go with it! Small groups is one of those times where you can chuck what you planned, because even though you planned a specific activity chucking it doesn't mean you are throwing out everything, you still have your big picture plan!

4. Teach, assess, repeat

Now it's time to teach. You've tested, grouped, planned, collected materials, organized them, now all that's left is to pull the groups and get to work. Cherish this time with your kiddos, because they really do look forward to this time with you. It's the time for your shy kiddos to shine and feel confident. It's the time for them to ask questions, make mistakes, and get messy (yes, I did just quote Mrs. Frizzle!) and it's the time to make those relationships and connections with your kiddos.

The hardest part about groups for me isn't the tests and planning and materials and all that, it's gathering up the energy to actually sit down and DO IT. I get wrapped up in my day and that I could answer just one more email, or type up one more IEP report, or, or, or. Then I remember that my student is finally starting to pause before looking at words with cl- blends. That student I had a great discussion with about Nazi Germany. The students who finally GOT equivalent fractions.

If you start to get overwhelmed, then simplify. Just do writing, or Word Study or math facts. Use your Scholastic News and dive deep. Print off an interesting Newsela article and discuss in depth. For a couple months I threw all my plans out the window and turned Teacher Time into a Book Club where we discussed chapter books together and wrote short responses. I saw so much growth in that time span. 

Then when you're ready, assess again, and repeat 😁

xoxo-Mae

Next Week:

Part 2: What should students do when they are not with me for Teacher Time?